Opinion: Censorship leads to chaos, loss of independent thought

I’ve been called a lot of things in my life, some of them endearing, most of them not.

When Barack Obama referred to conservatives like me as people who cling to our guns and religion, I was offended. Later, when Hillary Clinton called conservatives who weren’t going to vote for her a “basket of deplorables,” it looked as if another Democrat was employing crude, awkward rhetoric to gin up her base. It had the opposite effect, which helped put another guy in office who wasn’t shy about insulting people.

“Muslim ban,” “rapists and murderers” and “bleeding out of her whatever” are some of Trump’s greatest hits. They repelled many Americans while having the exact opposite effect on his fans.

And then we have the current president, who thinks it’s fine to call people like me “semi-fascists,” which is his attempt to tar those of us who pay our college debt and don’t support killing babies in the ninth month as totalitarian brutes. I can’t really blame President Joe Biden for words that someone else wrote for him, since we know that he even needs assistance to insult people these days.

My point is that insults, whether they come from the left or the right, usually just fill up one revolution of the news cycle, inspire social media outrage, and then, pfft, we move on to the next crisis.

Sadly, though, that’s not always the case. This summer Salman Rushdie was brutally assaulted by a knife-wielding zealot from New Jersey. This was a Muslim who had been radicalized into believing that Rushdie deserved to die for having dared write a satirical novel about the Prophet Mohammed decades ago. Rushdie has carried an actual “fatwa” over his head since “The Satanic Verses” was published in 1989, and until recently managed to live his life in relative, guarded peace. But this year, the words he’d written came back against him like bullets.

Words can be powerful, when used in the right way and the right context. Censoring them leads to chaos, and a loss of the most important attribute of humanity: the independent mind.

Words were so powerful that they lit the dark corners of a Siberian gulag in the 1970s. They were so powerful that they triggered a human rights movement in the 19th century American South. They were so powerful that they provided the framework for the Judeo-Christian society. They were so powerful that they ignited a revolution in 18th Century France. They have been used for good, and they have been manipulated into weapons, as we saw with Rushdie. But words themselves are pure, and access to them is essential.

That’s why I support librarians who fight against censorship, even when the books they champion violate my morals and my fundamental principles. That’s why I reject those who want to erase the sort of language they don’t like, and the political right and left are equally guilty of this great sin. That’s why I was horrified to see what happened after the Black Lives Matter protest muzzled those who supported the police, and the New American Cultural Revolution sought to silence those of us who think Western civilization cannot be misrepresented by professional victims. White men did good things, and we cannot be shamed into ignoring that.

Christine Flowers is a columnist for the Delaware County Daily Times. Contact her at:

[email protected]